separation-vs-divorce-whats-difference

Separation vs. Divorce: What’s the Difference?

Separation vs. Divorce: What’s the Difference?

If you are considering legal separation or divorce, you probably have a lot of questions. The first one might be: what is the difference between a separation and a divorce and which one is right for me?

In a legal separation, a couple is still married but living apart, with a court outlining the rights and duties of the couple on a number of factors (outlined below). With a divorce, the marriage has legally ended. Legal separations are fairly uncommon, but a useful solution for couples looking to work through financial and/or personal issues within the marriage as they consider divorce in the future.

There are many considerations when deciding whether a legal separation or divorce is right for you and your spouse. Here at Ohiku Law, we help people just like you navigate the often complex world of divorce law. Read on to learn more about the differences and similarities between legal separation and divorce and peruse our website for more information.

What is the difference between legal separation and divorce?

There are a number of important differences between legal separation and divorce. The most important difference to understand is that, in a legal separation, the spouses are still married. After a divorce, they are not. Here are some other key differences:

  • Health insurance: if one partner is covered under the other partner’s health insurance, they can continue to be covered even if legally separated. The same is true with other key benefits like social security. After a divorce, spouses can no longer share benefits in this way.
  • Financial/health care decision-making: when legally separated, spouses are still considered next-of-kin and are able to make important decisions on the other’s behalf. Divorced spouses lose this privilege. 
  • Ability to remarry: if legally separate, the spouses are still married and unable to marry someone else. After a divorce, the marriage has been dissolved and both spouses are free to legally marry again.
  • Shared debts and marital property: Wisconsin is what’s known as a “marital property state” meaning all property and debts incurred during the marriage are shared between spouses. Legally separated spouses still share marital property and debts. Divorced spouses resolve these issues while ending the marriage.
  • Property benefits: legally separated spouses will still benefit from the other’s property should their spouse die. After a divorce, spouses do not retain legal rights to the other’s property.
  • Reconciliation: if legally separated, it is possible for spouses to reconcile without having to legally remarry. After a divorce, reconciliation without legal remarriage is impossible.

What similarities exist between legal separation and divorce? 

In both separation and divorce, the court will make decisions on the following elements:

  • Child custody and visitation rights
  • Division of property as appropriate for the spouse’s situation
  • Separation maintenance in relation to child custody and alimony, though with a legal separation these are decided by the court through a “motion pending litigation.”

Trial vs. permanent separation

If you are considering a legal separation, you have a couple of options to choose from depending on your unique situation. Before going through a legal process, you may decide to try what’s called a “trial separation,” an informal arrangement between spouses. Spouses may decide to move forward with legal separation or divorce after a trial separation or may decide to reconcile.

A permanent separation means the spouses have decided to separate permanently. This may mean they decide to file separation paperwork to begin a legal separation or move forward with a divorce. The treatment of property and debt during a trial, permanent, and legal separation can be complex, so consult an experienced divorce lawyer to find out what you need to know.
Whether you are looking into legal separation or divorce, you will want a trusted attorney on your side. I’m Odalo Ohiku and I work hard to set myself apart from traditional family law and divorce attorneys in Milwaukee. The team at Ohiku Law is there when you need us – 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Give us a call today to get started.

Milwaukee divorce and guardianship

Guardians Ad Litem in Family Court – Frequently Asked Questions

Guardians Ad Litem in Family Court – Frequently Asked Questions

Milwaukee divorce and guardianshipDivorce is a complex process made even more challenging when children are involved. If you have children, deciding how to structure your family’s future to best meet their needs is one of the most important decisions you will make in the divorce process. 

Legal custody, physical placement, and child support are the three main elements that will need to be decided upon for children in a divorce proceeding. “Legal custody” describes the responsibility of making major decisions for the children such as education and healthcare. “Physical placement” describes where and with whom the child lives. “Child support” describes the financial support of the child. If you and your partner disagree on one or more of these major elements, you will need to participate in a mediation process to resolve your differences and move forward. 

If you are unable to reach a satisfying decision on these issues even with the help of a mediator, the family court judge may appoint a specialized attorney, known as a “guardian ad litem” (GAL), to assist in the decision-making process. Below are answers to the most frequently asked questions about the role of a GAL. 

What is a guardian ad litem (GAL)?

A GAL is a licensed attorney whose role is to investigate, determine, and represent the best interests of the children involved in a divorce proceeding. 

The responsibilities of a GAL include investigating the ins and outs of the child’s life and experience as part of a family, participating in negotiations and mediation, and advancing a position on major areas of a divorce proceeding that involved children: legal custody, physical placement and, where appropriate, child support. 

The GAL is not the child’s attorney, nor do they fulfill any of the duties of a parent or guardian. Rather, the role of the GAL is to advocate in court on behalf of the best interests of the child. 

Why might a GAL become involved in a divorce case? 

If the parties in a divorce proceeding cannot come to an agreement on major issues affecting children, like physical placement and legal custody, they move to mediation. If they still cannot come to an agreement or mediation is not possible or appropriate in the situation, the court will appoint a GAL. 

A GAL may also be appointed if a judge is concerned about the welfare of the child or children involved in a divorce proceeding. A GAL may be appointed at any time during the case but is usually brought on in the beginning. One situation in which a court may decide not to appoint a GAL is in a modification proceeding where a judge feels this support is unnecessary. 

How is a GAL appointed?

Either the family court commissioner or judge in a divorce case appoints a GAL, and may do so on their own accord or when requested by one of the parents. How the GAL is chosen depends on the law of the county – the GAL is either chosen from a list of attorneys or is specifically contracted by the county to fulfill this duty when necessary. 

What is the role of the GAL? 

The ultimate goal of the GAL is to identify and represent the best interests of the child or children involved in a divorce case. In fulfilling this role, a GAL may be involved in negotiation of settlements, conduct investigations into allegations of abuse or negligence, hire expert consultants, conduct witness interviews, comment on agreements or parenting plans submitted, and engage in court proceedings. 

Either parent in the divorce proceeding can request a status hearing on the work of the GAL. However, this can only happen 120 days after the appointment date. A second hearing can be requested 120 days after the first status hearing. 

Does the GAL meet with the parents and child/children?

Yes. The GAL meets with both parents in their office, usually holding separate meetings with each. The GAL will decide if and when to meet with the child or children and, if they do decide to meet, what location would be most appropriate for the meeting. 

What does a GAL’s investigation into issues that affect the child look like? 

As a divorce attorney in Milwaukee, a GAL only investigates issues that are relevant to the case. Much of the GAL’s investigation falls under the umbrella of “informal discovery,” or interviews with parties involved in or relevant to the case. The GAL may ask for the input of experts such as a psychologist or social worker and may request that the parents sign a release authorizing them to review school and medical records. If one or both parents have issues with alcohol or drugs, a GAL may request that the judge order screening tests. 

Other elements of a GAL’s investigation fall under “formal discovery,” including interrogatories, requesting documents, and conducting depositions.

What factors does a GAL consider in their investigation? 

A GAL considers a number of factors before making a determination and recommendation to the court. Some of these factors may be: the wishes of the parents and child/children; whether there has been abuse or drug or alcohol use that has impacted the child; the safety of all parties involved; the age and developmental needs of the child; the ability of the child to adjust to their living situation, educational situation, and changes in home life; the relationship of the child to their parents and extended family; plans put forward by the parents for supporting and caring for the child; the testimony of experts like social workers and health care professionals; the mental and physical health of the parents; the relationship between the parents and their perceived ability to cooperate in the future on the needs of the child; and many other important factors. 

What happens after a GAL completes their investigation? 

After completing their investigation, the GAL usually gives the parents and attorneys a preliminary summary of what they plan to put in front of the judge. After this preliminary summary, the attorneys and parents meet to discuss the findings and see if they can reach an agreement. If they cannot, the case proceeds to trial before a judge, where the GAL shares their findings and final decision is reached. 

How is the GAL paid? 

The judge in a divorce case decides who will pay for the GAL. Usually, they determine that the parents will split the cost of the GAL. In cases where the judge determines that one or both parents are unable to pay, the county may become responsible for payment. However, in this case, the parents are still responsible for paying any fees and may be required to pay back the county over time. 

Can I request to change GALs? 

Only a judge can remove a GAL from a case and there are very few circumstances in which they would decide to do so. 

How long is a GAL involved in a divorce case? 

Statute dictates that a GAL serves in their role until one of two things happen: either the parents reach a written agreement resolving the relevant issues or the judge makes a decision in the case at a hearing. 

A judge may decide to dismiss a GAL if they decide it is no longer necessary to employ these services. In case of an appeal, the same GAL is involved unless the judge says otherwise. If a new motion is filed, the judge decides whether to appoint the same or a different GAL to represent the interests of the child. 

Understanding Child Custody Law in Wisconsin

Understanding Child Custody Law in Wisconsin

Understanding Child Custody Law in Wisconsin

Ohiku LawUnderstanding Child Custody Law in Wisconsin

The main goal of family courts in the state of Wisconsin is to facilitate the healthiest and safest possible custody arrangement for a child. To this end, courts in Wisconsin aim for joint child custody or an agreeable co-parenting plan wherever possible. However, child custody law in Wisconsin will accommodate both sole and joint legal custody arrangements.

I’m Odalo Ohiku. Here at Ohiku Law, I help Milwaukee families navigate the often complicated world of child custody. Every family’s situation is different and only an experienced attorney can help you come to the best solution for you and your child. Below is a handy guide to understanding child custody law in Wisconsin, but give me a call to discuss further. 

What does “legal custody” mean?

The term “legal custody” refers to the legal right of a parent to make significant decisions about their children. These include decisions about health care, education, religion, and consent to marry or join the military. This term does not cover where a child lives, which is decided separately and is referred to as “physical placement.”

Who will get custody of your child?

The primary objective of family courts in Wisconsin is to find the best custody solution for the child or children. Before going to court, parents should take the opportunity to try and come to an agreement on their own or with the help of attorneys in a mediation process. If these solutions do not work, the child custody case will need to be heard and decided upon in court.

The court considers many factors when deciding custody, including:

  • The age of the child
  • The living situation of each parent
  • The relationship between the child and each parent
  • The preference of the child in regards to living arrangement
  • The mental and bodily health of each parent
  • What arrangement will provide for stability and consistency
  • The willingness of each parent to co-parent cooperatively
  • Past violence or substance abuse

A major part of any child custody arrangement is the creation of a parenting plan. This is an outline of care agreed upon by both parents and becomes legally binding through a court order.

What is the difference between joint and sole child custody?

Joint legal custody gives both parents the right to make major decisions on behalf of and concerning their children. These decisions must be agreed upon with both parents getting an equal say in the final decision. Joint legal custody is the presumed outcome of any custody case unless there are outstanding circumstances, such as a history of violence, or if the parents come to a different agreement.

Sole legal custody gives only one parent the right to make major decisions concerning the child.

Depending on the circumstances, the court may decide that one parent is allowed to make decisions around certain issues, such as education.

How does child custody work if the parents are unmarried?

Custody law in Wisconsin remains the same whether the parents are married or unmarried. Both parents retain equal right to make major decisions about the child unless otherwise ordered by the court.

If child paternity is in question, certain procedures need to be followed to determine custody. The father can sign an acknowledgment of paternity with the agreement of the mother or, if the mother contests paternity, can petition the court for a DNA test.

Child custody law is extremely complex and every family’s situation is different. By seeking the help of an attorney experienced in family law, you can ensure the best custody outcome for you and your child.

Another element of custody law is that it can quickly become heated and emotional – there is just so much at stake. If parents can’t come to an agreement, the court process can become stressful for everyone involved, including the child or children. Having an experienced advocate on your side will make the whole process easier, and I do everything I can to ensure the best interests of the child are met.

At Ohiku Law, my top priority is to be there for my clients. I am proud to serve families in Milwaukee and surrounding communities with expert family law and divorce law services. Don’t spend another day confused or stressed about your situation – give me a call to get started today.

Why hire a divorce attorney in Milwaukee

3 Reasons to Hire a Divorce Lawyer

3 Reasons to Hire a Divorce Lawyer

Why hire a divorce attorney in MilwaukeeEarly in the divorce process, you may be tempted to consider representing yourself in court. One of the biggest reasons people choose to do so is that they think it will save them money, so they overlook some of the significant downsides to foregoing the advice and support of a divorce lawyer

Perhaps you weren’t married for long, or you and your spouse do not have children or significant assets. In certain cases, you may be ok using a kit or online service instead of hiring a lawyer to help you with your divorce. However, the majority of people see big benefits in hiring an experienced divorce attorney. 

Here are 3 reasons why you should hire a divorce lawyer:

  1. Expertise in family court and divorce law. In hiring an attorney experienced in family court and marital law, you benefit from their years of expertise in navigating the often complicated divorce process. Those who represent themselves are held to the same standard as a divorce attorney in court, receiving no special treatment from the judge. In fact, not knowing the law, what documents you need, or what the next steps are in the divorce process will almost certainly cause a judge to lose sympathy and patience for your cause. Even experienced lawyers going through a divorce process hire an attorney if marital law is not their area of expertise.
  2. An objective perspective. Going through a divorce can be extremely emotional, distracting, and disruptive to your normal routine. Added to this emotional stress are the complexity, time, and money that goes into the legal process of getting a divorce. In hiring a divorce lawyer, you gain a team member who can provide an outside, expert perspective, answering your questions, guiding you as you make decisions and set priorities, and providing advice based on their years of experience. Your divorce attorney has your best interests in mind during a time when you may not even be sure what a satisfying solution may look like. The most “successful” divorce cases end in compromise, with both sides agreeing to a solution that may not necessarily be exactly what they were hoping, but is best for everyone involved. An experienced attorney can help you focus on the big picture rather than getting bogged down by every little thing. As a divorce attorney myself, I know that my clients have limited time and money, so I do my very best to move the process along, providing support and an objective, expert perspective along the way.
  3. One word: paperwork. Unless you’ve previously gone through a divorce without hiring a lawyer, it’s hard to imagine the amount of paperwork needed to complete the process. In deciding to represent yourself, you miss out on having an expert at every stage of the divorce process ensure you have the documentation you need. In court, the judge relies heavily on documentation to make their judgment, and not having the right paperwork can hurt your case by making you seem careless or intentionally evasive. An experienced divorce attorney can make sure your paperwork is filled out correctly in a way that makes a persuasive case, better positioning you for a favorable outcome. Finally, not having the right paperwork will slow down the divorce process significantly; in fact, it’s one of the biggest reasons cases get tied up in the courts. 

There are lots of reasons why hiring a divorce lawyer is the right call. In addition to having an expert in marital law and family court on your team, you have someone you can turn to for advice, perspective, and help in seeing the bigger picture. 

You don’t have to go through the divorce process alone; at Ohiku Law, we help clients in Milwaukee and across the region with expert legal advice and services. Divorce is our area of expertise, and we are passionate about ensuring you and your family get through this stressful time as quickly and smoothly as possible. For questions or to get started today, give us a call. mobile notary Jacksonville, Accountant Abbotsford, Lawyers in Yonkers

Some Reflections on Body Cavity Searches at District 5 in Milwaukee

Some Reflections on Body Cavity Searches at District 5 in Milwaukee

Wis. Stat. 968.255 (3) clearly states:  “No person other than a physician, physician assistant or registered nurse licensed to practice in this state may conduct a body cavity search.”

Wis. Stat. 968.225 allows for “strip searches” so long as certain guidelines are followed.  It defines “strip search” as “a search in which a detained person’s genitals, pubic area, buttock or anus, or a detained female person’s breast, is uncovered and either exposed to view or touched by a person conducting the search.”

In State v. Wallace, the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin shed light on the difference between a “strip search” and “body cavity search.”  Regarding the search in that case, it stated the strip search “became a visual body cavity search when the officer had the defendant bend over to expose his anus.”   Additionally, the court noted that since a body cavity search is more intrusive than a strip search, a person’s consent to a strip search does not constitute valid consent to the more intrusive body cavity search.

The U.S. Supreme Court views all searches of a person’s body as highly intrusive invasions of one’s privacy. Addressing only the limited “pat-down” search of a suspect in Terry v. Ohio, the Supreme Court explained that, “even a limited search of the outer clothing for weapons constitutes a severe, though brief, intrusion upon cherished personal security, and it must surely be an annoying, frightening, and perhaps humiliating experience.” Because of their significantly greater degree of intrusiveness, searches such as the one conducted in this case are closely scrutinized when challenged under the Fourth Amendment.

The United States Supreme Court has long deemed searches of any kind an attack on the most sacred of our rights, namely, our personal liberty.  In that vein, I believe it is abundantly clear that our Supreme Court identifies a body cavity search as one of the most intrusivehumiliating, and degrading experiences to which a person can be subjected.  Similarly, the Seventh Circuit has described searches in Mary Beth G. v. City of Chicago “involving the visual inspection of the anal and genital areas as ‘demeaningdehumanizingundignifiedhumiliatingterrifying,unpleasantembarrassing,  repulsivesignifying degradation and submission.’” For these reasons, and fundamental to our free society, it is imperative that we protect all our citizens from illegal body cavity searches by any means necessary within the confines of the law.

What does Due Process really mean?

What does Due Process really mean?

In light of everything going on in the NFL and the discussions about whether or not players have the right to due process I wanted to take a look at what Due Process really means and why it is so important.

Due Process is a legal concept, so when you hear people discussing whether or not players are receiving their Due Process by the NFL they are actually misunderstanding what due process means. In fact not only is Due Process a legal concept, it is one of the most important legal concepts we have, and it is the only legal concept stated twice within our Constitution. First, the Fifth Amendment states that nobody shall be “deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of the law.” Second, the Fourteenth Amendment uses these same exact words to put the same requirements on the states. By doing this, our founders ensured that, at all levels of government, our freedoms would be protected.

Due process is a legal concept that can be looked at in two ways. The first way, procedural due process, essentially ensures that there are safeguards and procedures in place to protect the rights of American citizens. While these procedures can vary by court and by state, there are two essential elements; that citizens must be notified of the charges against them and citizens must be given an opportunity to be heard and dispute those charges.  The second way, substantive due process, ensures that the government can not create laws that infringe upon people’s basic rights, such as, the right to privacy, right to live without being judged based on race or sexual orientation, and the right to vote.

As you can see, Due Process is a legal concept that is in place to protect people’s basic human rights. It does not include a right to work for a certain company, a right to get paid a certain amount of money, or a right to be a professional athlete.

Where is the line between reasonable discipline and Child Abuse?

Where is the line between reasonable discipline and Child Abuse?

While this differs in every state, in Wisconsin two distinct statutes control what constitutes Child Abuse. The first statute, Wis. Stat. 948.03, defines exactly what constitutes Child Abuse. While there are differing degrees, this statute lays out three separate situations that constitute Child Abuse; Intentional Causation of Bodily Harm, Reckless Causation of Bodily Harm, and Failing to Act to Prevent Bodily Harm. In all three of these “bodily harm” is defined broadly as “physical pain or injury, illness, or any impairment of physical condition.” The statute defines “reckless” as “conduct which creates a situation of unreasonable risk of harm to and demonstrates a conscious disregard for the safety of a child.”[i]

The second statute, Wis. Stat. 939(5)(b), defines what constitutes “reasonable discipline.” This statute which refers to what is commonly known as parental privilege states: “When the actor’s conduct is reasonable discipline of a child by a person responsible for the child’s welfare. Reasonable discipline may involve only such force as a reasonable person believes is necessary. It is never reasonable discipline to use force which is intended to cause great bodily harm or death or creates an unreasonable risk of great bodily harm or death.”[ii]

When someone accused of Child Abuse asserts parental privilege, this constitutes an affirmative defense. Basically an affirmative defense is a fact that, if proven, negates or mitigates the legal consequences of someone’s otherwise illegal conduct.  Once this privilege is asserted the burden falls on the State to disprove the parental privilege defense.  There are three elements that must be true in order for parental privilege to work. The three elements in question are “(1) the use of force must be reasonably necessary; (2) the amount and nature of the force used must be reasonable; and (3) the force used must not be known to cause, or create a substantial risk of, great bodily harm or death.”[iii] If the State can prove that even one of these three factors is not present that is enough to overcome this defense.

While there are three elements that must be proven to successfully assert parental privilege there is one overarching question present in all three elements. What is reasonable? “Reasonable force is that force which a reasonable person would believe is necessary.”[iv] The Wisconsin Supreme Court has clarified that “[t]he test of unreasonableness is met at the point at which a parent ceases to act in good faith and with parental affection and acts immoderately, cruelly, or mercilessly with a malicious desire to inflict pain, rather than make a genuine effort to correct the child by proper means.”[v] There is no inflexible rule that defines what, under all circumstances, is unreasonable or excessive corporal punishment. Rather, the accepted degree of force must vary according to the age, sex, physical and mental condition, disposition of the child, conduct of the child, nature of the discipline, and all the surrounding circumstances.[vi]

[i] Wis. Stat. 948.03

[ii] Wis. Stat. 939(5)(b)

[iii] State v. KIMBERLY B., 699 NW 2d 641

[iv] WIS JI — CRIMINAL 950

[v] State v. Thorpe, 429 A.2d 785, 788 (R.I. 1981)

[vi] See WIS JI — CRIMINAL 950

Arrest: Charged with a Noncriminal Offense v. Charged with a Crime

Arrest: Charged with a Noncriminal Offense v. Charged with a Crime

What happens if you’re charged with a noncriminal offense?
If you’re charged with an ordinance or traffic offense that is not a crime (such as speeding), you’ll be given a citation. In most cases you won’t be taken into custody. Police may NOT search you or your property without permission if you are not taken into custody for a noncriminal offense. The citation will usually give you a choice of paying a forfeiture or going to court. It will state a date for you to appear in court if you choose not to pay the forfeiture.
Your first court appearance is known as the arraignment, during which you enter a plea of “guilty,” “not guilty,” or “no contest.” The “no contest” plea means that you are not contesting the offense charged. The “no contest” plea will result in a conviction, but the conviction cannot be used against you in a lawsuit. For instance, let’s say you have an auto accident. As a result of the accident, you’re given a traffic citation for a violation. In this case you may want to plead “no contest,” in case the other driver decides to sue you.
In most ordinance or traffic cases, when you plead “not guilty” you’re given a pretrial date and a trial date. In noncriminal cases, you do not have an automatic right to a jury trial. Unless you specifically demand a jury trial and pay the required fee within 10 days of your initial appearance, your trial will be held before the judge. At the pretrial you’ll meet with the prosecutor and try to settle the case. For example, you may try to change a speeding charge to a lesser point violation.
If you can’t resolve the charge at pretrial, you must appear at the trial. You may or may not want to have an attorney, depending upon the seriousness of the offense, the status of your driver’s license, and so on.
If the judge finds you guilty and you don’t pay the forfeiture by the deadline for payment, your driver’s license may be suspended if the violation is for a traffic offense. Otherwise, you could be jailed or ordered to perform community service.
What happens if you’re charged with a crime?
Usually you’ll be taken into custody when you’re arrested. The police may read you your rights, photograph you, and take your fingerprints. If you are arrested without a warrant, a judicial magistrate must determine whether there is enough probable cause to charge you, and this usually must be done within 48 hours of your arrest. The 48-hour rule does not apply to an arrest with a warrant, because a judicial determination of probable cause has already been made to support issuing the warrant.
Remember that you have two important rights: the right to remain silent and the right to a lawyer. If you are indigent, an attorney from the State Public Defender’s office will be appointed. Police may not ask you any more questions if you claim either or both these basic rights. If you are unable to communicate with the court or your attorney because of a disability or a language barrier, an interpreter will be provided for you.
To be released from custody after your arrest, you may be required to post bail. In some cases, you can do this by a signature bond (a written promise to appear in court). In other cases, you may be required to provide either a secured surety bond (you put up property, such as a car or house), or cash (which may be posted by you or someone else). In addition, the judge may impose other conditions on you that he or she deems reasonable to assure your appearance or protects members of the community.
If you’re convicted of a misdemeanor, you may be imprisoned for up to one year. Any “time” you serve will be in the county jail or house of correction. A felony charge is much more serious, because it can mean a year or more in prison. In either case, it’s very wise to consult an attorney. If you can’t afford one, the judge will refer you to the State Public Defender’s office.

Sentencing Reforms Can Help Save Our Communities

As an African-American who is a practicing criminal defense attorney, with a beautiful wife who is in law enforcement and a brother who is incarcerated, I know first-hand the devastation that follows from high incarceration rates. Wisconsin has the highest incarceration rates of African-American men in the nation, with more than half of Milwaukee County’s African-American men in their thirties having served time in prison. It is a moral imperative that all stakeholders collaborate to eliminate racial disparities throughout our criminal court system from start to finish. What Can Be Done?

 

1) Prevention

A critical component of sentencing reform starts with preventing individuals from traveling the road that leads to court appearances for sentencing in the first place. From my mother, a dedicated teacher with more than 30 years of service, I learned the value and long-term effects of a good, solid education. A good education brings opportunities and greater exposure to resources that individuals will be loath to squander. Moreover, education gives individuals a sense of self-worth and accomplishment.
For example, a program that helped me as a young teen was the Evans Scholars program. The Evans Scholars Foundation provides full academic scholarships to selected colleges and universities (including

Marquette and UW-Madison) for individuals whom have at least a B average in high school through their junior year, outstanding character, and financial need, and who have worked as a golf caddy for at least two

years. When I started, I did not have a clue about being a golf caddy, but Iearned. I earned the Evans Scholarship to Marquette and saved a good deal of my golf caddy earnings along the way. A high quality education empowers individuals to seek out positive experiences.

 

2) Diversion

Once an individual has been brought under the jurisdiction of the criminal court system, we should continue to focus on prevention through diversion. Where appropriate, prosecutors and defense attorneys should work in tandem throughout the pre-charging phase to determine whether a person (excluding those charged with violent offenses) should be formally charged with a crime. For many, the sheer process of being arrested and spending several days in jail is a sufficient jolt to their systems to correct their behavior. Tenets of this approach are prevalent in the concept of dosage probation—namely, giving an individual the “dose” of probation needed to correct behavior.
When formally charging an individual with a crime cannot be avoided, prosecutors and defense attorneys should work together to determine whether diversionary programs, such as deferred prosecution agreements and first-time offender programs, are appropriate. Under these options, an individual enters into a contract with the prosecutor requiring him or her to fulfill certain conditions. Upon successfully

completing the conditions, the case is either dismissed entirely or the charge is amended from a felony to a misdemeanor.
Furthermore, individuals with drug treatment or mental health needs should be screened and diverted to specialty courts such as drug treatment and mental health courts. Both of these specialty courts divert non-violent individuals from jail to treatment. Upon successful completion of the specialty court program, the case is either dismissed entirely or the charge amended from a felony to a misdemeanor.

 

3) Restoration

If an individual is ineligible for prevention or diversion, our focus should shift to restoration. We must institute mechanisms for restoring the individual’s ability to overcome collateral consequences of a criminal conviction, such as expunging the court record. For certain offenses committed by individuals 25 or younger, a court may order at the time of sentencing that the individual’s record be expunged upon successful completion of the sentence. Our legislature should look into widening the net of those eligible for expungement. Additionally, our legislature should give deep thought to determining whether our

current expungement statute should apply retroactively to include individuals sentenced before July 1, 2009. Prior to that date, a court could only expunge the court record if it was for a misdemeanor offense and the individual was under 21.

 

These are but a few of my thoughts. Sometimes I ponder whether stakeholders should be required to spend a night in prison to get a “real feel” for what it is to serve a sentence—not to punish stakeholders but rather to provide keen insight into decisions in which they play an essential role.

 

In an election year with political pundits pushing propaganda plus promises, let us avoid the hype and hone in on what has proven to work. I am in our criminal courts system day in and day out. Prevention, diversion, and restoration work—each producing tangible, direct results. Last September, I hosted the Second Chance Expungement Clinic at the Milwaukee Bar Association. I am happy to report that we helped a number of people with either expunging court records or removing arrest records. Today, some of them are gainfully employed and serve as living proof that this process works.